THE ROLE OF MOTIVATION IN THE QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58246/sjeconomics.v47i4.584

Keywords:

quality of higher education, scientific and pedagogical workers, work motivation, motivational potential, tangible and intangible incentives

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to determine the factors influencing the effectiveness of the staff of the IHE and justify their own approach to the system of motivation of research and teaching staff. The subject of the research is a set of theoretical and methodological provisions and practical aspects of managing the professional development of scientific and pedagogical workers of the IHE in the structure ensuring the quality of educational services.

The article defines the category "quality of higher education" and outlines the stages at which the quality of training specialists with higher education is ensured.

It is proven that motivation is an effective tool for managing the staff of the IHE, taking into account external and internal factors of the functioning educational institution. The key tool of the motivational mechanism is the formation of motivation for work and decision-making on work (inaction) to meet the need. The motivational core includes two groups' motives: external and internal. Internal motivation is related to the content of work and its significance for the employee, and external motivation is aimed at stimulating work by the administration of the enterprise. The motivational potential of a researcher is formed under the influence of external and internal incentives to work.

The main task of the management of higher education should be the formation of a holistic mechanism for the application of tangible and intangible methods of motivating research and teaching staff.

References

Bachynska O., Olshevskyi V. Paradigm of ensuring the competitiveness of higher education institutions in the context of modern challenges: monograph. Lviv: Lviv University of Trade and Economics Publishing House, 2018. 276 ?.

Ilyin E.P. Motivation and motives. Peter: SPb, 2000. 512 ?.

Lomonosov A.V. Analysis of staffing of the educational process in higher education institutions of III-IV accreditation levels. Economic space, 2008. ? 20/1. ?. 206-216.

Obles I.I. Methodological tools for researching the professional adaptation of a university teacher. URL: http://www.pedagogy-journal.kpu.zp.ua-/archive/2010/8/64.pdf.

Omelchenko L.M. Methods of forming the internal motivation of the activity of scientific and pedagogical workers of higher education institutions. URL: http://journals.nubip.edu.ua/index.php-/Pedagogica/article/viewFile/3085/3011.

Rosenbaum M., Grechenkova L., Ignatovich M., Grechenkov S. Complex socio-psychological assessment of the quality of work and professionalism of teaching staff of higher education institutions. Vysshaya shkola, 2009. ? 4. ?. 62-81.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-30

Issue

Section

Article